Comments on: Cutting Costs For Your Travel Business http://www.infinityfish.com/cutting-costs-for-your-travel-business/ SEO internet marketing tools, Local internet marketing consultant service seo Fri, 06 Mar 2009 13:39:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Mustbe http://www.infinityfish.com/cutting-costs-for-your-travel-business/comment-page-1/#comment-488 Mustbe Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:00:59 +0000 http://www.infinityfish.com/business-gadgets/cutting-costs-for-your-travel-business#comment-488 What I read in this article is as follows: I realize it concerns Traveling.., Point I got I will use my own example: If a potato cost .50 last year..this year it would be 1.00...next year 1.50...... Economy is going to get bad..... I hope everyone prepares there self for it... "If you can save a penny do it.... you will need to use it before its over with"<br><b>References : </b><br> What I read in this article is as follows:
I realize it concerns Traveling..,
Point I got I will use my own example:
If a potato cost .50 last year..this year it would be 1.00…next year 1.50……
Economy is going to get bad…..
I hope everyone prepares there self for it…
"If you can save a penny do it….
you will need to use it before its over with"
References :

]]> By: Steve B http://www.infinityfish.com/cutting-costs-for-your-travel-business/comment-page-1/#comment-487 Steve B Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:58:59 +0000 http://www.infinityfish.com/business-gadgets/cutting-costs-for-your-travel-business#comment-487 A) Do your own homework. My Analysis... The Article is presented by The TIMES. This is a Company that exists to make a Profit from it's readers by selling Newspapers. To sell Newspapers it is necessary to 'report' "news" that is relevant, interesting and perhaps even "exciting" to it's target Customer. In the case of the TIMES, the target Customers have traditionally been Business orientated middle-upper class men. Thus we can conclude :- 1) Anything written by it's employees (Reporters) is likely to be "tailored" (i.e. biased or exaggerated) and restricted (selectively reported) towards the target customer. 2) Where 'facts' are reported, the interpretation can be the complete reverse of the original intent - and often the opinions of the Reporters are mixed in with the facts in such a way that it is not easy to separate the two. 3) Comments that promote "sponsors" or heavy Advertisers (eg Barclaycard) may be added to the "news" in an attempt to 'push' 3rd party products (for example, Business Credit Cards). 4) The Companies "PR" Department may ask for some specific spin or 'message' to be 'pushed' - for example, "Green Credentials" (promotion of Rail Travel) So - read the article, extract the facts, discard the Reporters interpretations and opinions, ignore the blatant advertising and PR spin and make up your own mind about the issue.<br><b>References : </b><br> A) Do your own homework.

My Analysis…

The Article is presented by The TIMES. This is a Company that exists to make a Profit from it's readers by selling Newspapers. To sell Newspapers it is necessary to 'report' "news" that is relevant, interesting and perhaps even "exciting" to it's target Customer.

In the case of the TIMES, the target Customers have traditionally been Business orientated middle-upper class men.

Thus we can conclude :-
1) Anything written by it's employees (Reporters) is likely to be "tailored" (i.e. biased or exaggerated) and restricted (selectively reported) towards the target customer.
2) Where 'facts' are reported, the interpretation can be the complete reverse of the original intent – and often the opinions of the Reporters are mixed in with the facts in such a way that it is not easy to separate the two.
3) Comments that promote "sponsors" or heavy Advertisers (eg Barclaycard) may be added to the "news" in an attempt to 'push' 3rd party products (for example, Business Credit Cards).
4) The Companies "PR" Department may ask for some specific spin or 'message' to be 'pushed' – for example, "Green Credentials" (promotion of Rail Travel)

So – read the article, extract the facts, discard the Reporters interpretations and opinions, ignore the blatant advertising and PR spin and make up your own mind about the issue.
References :

]]>